EVMT vs VXUS
EVMT vs VXUS
Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. EVMT delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EVMT | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $7M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 11.54% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 15 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +5.26% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +29.45% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +2.25% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.9% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -48.3% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 27, 2022 | Jan 26, 2011 |
EVMT vs VXUS Performance
Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (EVMT) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EVMT returned +29.45% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, EVMT is up 5.26% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, EVMT compounded at +2.25% per year against +19.27% for VXUS. Across the full 4-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.86% annualized vs -7.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EVMT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.9% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -48.3% for EVMT and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.57. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EVMT charges 0.59% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $5 annually, a gap of $54 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EVMT currently yields 11.54% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
EVMT and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7862 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EVMT or VXUS?
EVMT has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $54 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EVMT or VXUS?
Over the past year EVMT returned +29.45% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so EVMT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), EVMT annualized -7.20% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EVMT or VXUS?
EVMT has been the more volatile fund at 19.9% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: EVMT -48.3% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both EVMT and VXUS?
EVMT and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.57, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EVMT and VXUS?
EVMT and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7862 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EVMT or VXUS?
EVMT yields 11.54% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so EVMT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.