EVSM vs IVV
Eaton Vance Short Duration Municipal Income ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EVSM | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.19% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $783M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.99% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 359 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +1.29% | +13.43% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.70% | +22.61% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 1.4% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -1.5% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Eaton Vance | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Tax Preferred | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 25, 2024 | May 15, 2000 |
EVSM vs IVV Performance
Eaton Vance Short Duration Municipal Income ETF (EVSM) is a ETF from Eaton Vance and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year EVSM returned +2.70% while IVV returned +22.61%. Year to date, EVSM is up 1.29% versus a gain of 13.43% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 1.4% for EVSM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -1.5% for EVSM and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.56. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EVSM charges 0.19% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $19 vs $3 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EVSM currently yields 2.99% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
EVSM and IVV share 0 holdings out of 603 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EVSM or IVV?
EVSM has an expense ratio of 0.19% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $16 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EVSM or IVV?
Over the past year EVSM returned +2.70% vs +22.61% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), EVSM annualized +3.40% vs +7.03% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EVSM or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 1.4% for EVSM. Worst drawdown: EVSM -1.5% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both EVSM and IVV?
EVSM and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.56, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EVSM and IVV?
EVSM and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 603 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EVSM or IVV?
EVSM yields 2.99% while IVV yields 1.09%, so EVSM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.