EVSM vs QQQ

EVSM vs QQQ

Which is better, EVSM or QQQ?

Municipal Bond against Large Cap Growth.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: QQQHigher Returns: QQQ

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricEVSMQQQ
Expense Ratio0.19%0.18%Best
AUM$828M$483.5B
Dividend Yield3.02%0.44%
Holdings380107
YTD Return+0.63%+15.21%Best
1Y Return+1.10%+19.78%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+24.58%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.93%
Volatility (annualized)1.5%Best17.7%
Max Drawdown-1.5%Best-22.8%
$10,000 over 2.5 years$10,764$16,105Best
Fund FamilyEaton VanceInvesco (US)
CategoryTax PreferredEquity
StyleMunicipal BondLarge Cap Growth
InceptionMar 25, 2024Mar 10, 1999

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 25, 2024 to Sep 16, 2026 (2.5 years).

EVSM vs QQQ growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.5 years both funds cover.

EVSM vs QQQ Performance

Eaton Vance Short Duration Municipal Income ETF (EVSM) is an ETF from Eaton Vance and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year EVSM returned +1.10% while QQQ returned +19.78%. Year to date, EVSM is up 0.63% versus a gain of 15.21% for QQQ.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.7% compared with 1.5% for EVSM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -1.5% for EVSM and -22.8% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.41. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

EVSM charges 0.19% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $19 vs $18 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EVSM currently yields 3.02% against 0.44% for QQQ.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 97 holdings in EVSM and 102 in QQQ, totalling 28.5% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

0 positions in common, counted across the 97 positions we hold weights for in EVSM and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 380 and 107.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of EVSM and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

EVSMQQQ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, EVSM or QQQ?

EVSM has an expense ratio of 0.19% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $1 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, EVSM or QQQ?

Over the past year EVSM returned +1.10% vs +19.78% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, EVSM or QQQ?

QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 17.7% annualized versus 1.5% for EVSM. Worst drawdown: EVSM -1.5% vs QQQ -22.8%.

Should I hold both EVSM and QQQ?

EVSM and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.41, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, EVSM or QQQ?

EVSM yields 3.02% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so EVSM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is QQQ better than EVSM?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.