EWL vs VYM
iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EWL | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $2.2B | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.74% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 46 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +7.99% | +16.16% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.49% | +26.05% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.48% | +18.43% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.00% | +12.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.9% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -54.7% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 12, 1996 | Nov 10, 2006 |
EWL vs VYM Performance
iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF (EWL) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EWL returned +22.49% while VYM returned +26.05%. Year to date, EWL is up 7.99% versus a gain of 16.16% for VYM.
Over three years, EWL compounded at +13.48% per year against +18.43% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +7.00% and +12.21% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.09% annualized vs +5.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EWL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.9% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -54.7% for EWL and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EWL charges 0.50% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $4 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EWL currently yields 1.74% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
EWL and VYM share 0 holdings out of 599 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EWL or VYM?
EWL has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $46 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EWL or VYM?
Over the past year EWL returned +22.49% vs +26.05% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), EWL annualized +5.92% vs +7.09% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EWL or VYM?
EWL has been the more volatile fund at 16.9% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: EWL -54.7% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both EWL and VYM?
EWL and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EWL and VYM?
EWL and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 599 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EWL or VYM?
EWL yields 1.74% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.