EWL vs VOO
iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, EWL or VOO?
VOO has been ahead.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 65.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EWL | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $2.4B | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.70% | 1.08% |
| Holdings | 48 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +6.47% | +13.37%Best |
| 1Y Return | +15.32% | +20.08%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.95% | +21.29%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.71% | +12.89%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.8% | 14.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -29.0%Best | -34.3% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $13,836 | $18,335Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 65.4% | 36.4%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 12, 1996 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 9, 2010 to Sep 4, 2026 (16 years).
EWL vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16 years both funds cover.
EWL vs VOO Performance
iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF (EWL) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EWL returned +15.32% while VOO returned +20.08%. Year to date, EWL is up 6.47% versus a gain of 13.37% for VOO.
Over three years, EWL compounded at +13.95% per year against +21.29% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +6.71% and +12.89% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.48% annualized vs +7.49%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EWL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.8% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.0% for EWL and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EWL charges 0.50% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EWL currently yields 1.70% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
13.8% of EWL's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 0.1% of VOO's money is in holdings EWL also owns.
EWL and VOO share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in EWL and 504 in VOO, against full books of 48 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 493 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for EWL (99.3% of the fund), and 1 for EWL that do not appear in VOO (0.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EWL | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROPROPER TECHNOLOGIES INC | 13.83% | 0.05% | 13.78% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EWL and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EWL or VOO?
EWL has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $47 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EWL or VOO?
Over the past year EWL returned +15.32% vs +20.08% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), EWL annualized +7.49% vs +13.48% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EWL or VOO?
EWL has been the more volatile fund at 14.8% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: EWL -29.0% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both EWL and VOO?
EWL and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between EWL and VOO?
13.8% of EWL's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 0.1% of VOO's is in holdings EWL also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in EWL and 504 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, EWL or VOO?
EWL yields 1.70% while VOO yields 1.08%, so EWL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than EWL?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 65.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.