EWP vs QQQ
iShares MSCI Spain ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, EWP or QQQ?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. EWP led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, QQQ over the full window. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 75.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EWP | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $2.3B | $486.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.71% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 28 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +15.57% | +17.44%Best |
| 1Y Return | +33.33%Best | +24.69% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +34.94%Best | +24.76% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +21.06%Best | +14.22% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.0%Best | 30.6% |
| Max Drawdown | -73.7%Best | -83.0% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $26,002Best | $19,441 |
| Top 10 Weight | 75.9% | 46.5%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Mar 12, 1996 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 10, 1999 to Sep 8, 2026 (27.5 years).
EWP vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
EWP vs QQQ Performance
iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year EWP returned +33.33% while QQQ returned +24.69%. Year to date, EWP is up 15.57% versus a gain of 17.44% for QQQ.
Over three years, EWP compounded at +34.94% per year against +24.76% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +21.06% and +14.22% respectively. Across the full 28-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.04% annualized vs +3.53%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 23.0% for EWP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -73.7% for EWP and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.41. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EWP charges 0.50% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $18 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EWP currently yields 2.71% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
4.0% of EWP's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 0.2% of QQQ's money is in holdings EWP also owns.
EWP and QQQ share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 22 positions we hold weights for in EWP and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 28 and 107.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 94 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for EWP (96.8% of the fund), and 1 for EWP that do not appear in QQQ (0.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EWP | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| FER:ASFerrovial Se | 4.05% | 0.21% | 3.84% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EWP and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EWP or QQQ?
EWP has an expense ratio of 0.50% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EWP or QQQ?
Over the past year EWP returned +33.33% vs +24.69% for QQQ, so EWP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (28 years), EWP annualized +3.53% vs +13.04% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EWP or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 23.0% for EWP. Worst drawdown: EWP -73.7% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both EWP and QQQ?
EWP and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.41, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between EWP and QQQ?
4.0% of EWP's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 0.2% of QQQ's is in holdings EWP also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 22 positions we hold weights for in EWP and 102 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, EWP or QQQ?
EWP yields 2.71% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so EWP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than EWP?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. EWP led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, QQQ over the full window. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 75.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.