EWP vs VTI
iShares MSCI Spain ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. EWP delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EWP | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $2.1B | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.81% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 30 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +16.64% | +14.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +36.54% | +22.19% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +34.62% | +21.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +20.92% | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.4% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -73.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 12, 1996 | May 24, 2001 |
EWP vs VTI Performance
iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EWP returned +36.54% while VTI returned +22.19%. Year to date, EWP is up 16.64% versus a gain of 14.22% for VTI.
Over three years, EWP compounded at +34.62% per year against +21.27% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +20.92% and +12.23% respectively. Across the full 25-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.14% annualized vs +5.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EWP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.4% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -73.7% for EWP and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EWP charges 0.50% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EWP currently yields 2.81% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
EWP and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2807 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EWP or VTI?
EWP has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EWP or VTI?
Over the past year EWP returned +36.54% vs +22.19% for VTI, so EWP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (25 years), EWP annualized +5.73% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EWP or VTI?
EWP has been the more volatile fund at 23.4% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: EWP -73.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both EWP and VTI?
EWP and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EWP and VTI?
EWP and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2807 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EWP or VTI?
EWP yields 2.81% while VTI yields 1.07%, so EWP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.