EWQ vs VTI

EWQ vs VTI

Which is better, EWQ or VTI?

VTI has been ahead.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricEWQVTI
Expense Ratio0.50%0.03%Best
AUM$355M$689.2B
Dividend Yield3.11%1.06%
Holdings1213,542
YTD Return-3.02%+12.23%Best
1Y Return-1.22%+12.74%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+9.44%+21.44%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+4.95%+10.83%Best
Volatility (annualized)20.6%15.3%Best
Max Drawdown-64.0%-56.6%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$12,732$16,722Best
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionMar 12, 1996May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 31, 2001 to Nov 11, 2026 (25.4 years).

EWQ vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 25.4 years both funds cover.

EWQ vs VTI Performance

iShares MSCI France ETF (EWQ) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EWQ returned -1.22% while VTI returned +12.74%. Year to date, EWQ is down 3.02% versus a gain of 12.23% for VTI.

Over three years, EWQ compounded at +9.44% per year against +21.44% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +4.95% and +10.83% respectively. Across the full 25-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +7.98% annualized vs +3.62%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

EWQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.6% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -64.0% for EWQ and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

EWQ charges 0.50% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EWQ currently yields 3.11% against 1.06% for VTI.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of EWQ and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

EWQVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, EWQ or VTI?

EWQ has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $47 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, EWQ or VTI?

Over the past year EWQ returned -1.22% vs +12.74% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (25 years), EWQ annualized +3.62% vs +7.98% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, EWQ or VTI?

EWQ has been the more volatile fund at 20.6% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: EWQ -64.0% vs VTI -56.6%.

Should I hold both EWQ and VTI?

EWQ and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, EWQ or VTI?

EWQ yields 3.11% while VTI yields 1.06%, so EWQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than EWQ?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.