EWV vs IVV

EWV vs IVV

Which is better, EWV or IVV?

Opposite sides of the same exposure.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.67, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricEWVIVV
Expense Ratio0.95%0.03%Best
AUM$5M$876.4B
Dividend Yield5.41%1.06%
Holdings3508
YTD Return-33.87%+11.03%Best
1Y Return-37.79%+15.62%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-30.11%+20.81%Best
5Y Return (annualized)-16.77%+12.61%Best
Volatility (annualized)30.3%15.7%Best
Max Drawdown--55.3%
$10,000 over 5 years$3,994$18,109Best
Fund FamilyProSharesiShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleTrading-Inverse EquityLarge Cap Blend
InceptionNov 6, 2007May 15, 2000

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 8, 2007 to Sep 16, 2026 (18.9 years).

EWV vs IVV growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 18.9 years both funds cover.

EWV vs IVV Performance

ProShares UltraShort MSCI Japan (EWV) is an ETF from ProShares and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year EWV returned -37.79% while IVV returned +15.62%. Year to date, EWV is down 33.87% versus a gain of 11.03% for IVV.

Over three years, EWV compounded at -30.11% per year against +20.81% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are -16.77% and +12.61% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +9.52% annualized vs -19.90%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

EWV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.3% compared with 15.7% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.67. They move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, while paying both funds' fees.

Fees and Cost Over Time

EWV charges 0.95% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EWV currently yields 5.41% against 1.06% for IVV.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of EWV and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

EWVIVV

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, EWV or IVV?

EWV has an expense ratio of 0.95% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $92 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, EWV or IVV?

Over the past year EWV returned -37.79% vs +15.62% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), EWV annualized -19.90% vs +9.52% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, EWV or IVV?

EWV has been the more volatile fund at 30.3% annualized versus 15.7% for IVV.

Should I hold both EWV and IVV?

EWV and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of -0.67, so they move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, and pays both funds' fees on the way. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, EWV or IVV?

EWV yields 5.41% while IVV yields 1.06%, so EWV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is IVV better than EWV?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.67, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.