EWV vs VTI
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Japan vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EWV | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $6M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.07% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 4 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -34.93% | +14.22% | |
| 1Y Return | -41.74% | +22.19% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -32.05% | +21.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -19.75% | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.4% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -99.3% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 6, 2007 | May 24, 2001 |
EWV vs VTI Performance
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Japan (EWV) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EWV returned -41.74% while VTI returned +22.19%. Year to date, EWV is down 34.93% versus a gain of 14.22% for VTI.
Over three years, EWV compounded at -32.05% per year against +21.27% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -19.75% and +12.23% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.14% annualized vs -20.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EWV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.4% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -99.3% for EWV and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.68. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EWV charges 0.95% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EWV currently yields 5.07% against 1.07% for VTI.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EWV or VTI?
EWV has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EWV or VTI?
Over the past year EWV returned -41.74% vs +22.19% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), EWV annualized -20.06% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EWV or VTI?
EWV has been the more volatile fund at 30.4% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: EWV -99.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both EWV and VTI?
EWV and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.68, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, EWV or VTI?
EWV yields 5.07% while VTI yields 1.07%, so EWV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.