EWW vs VTI
iShares MSCI Mexico ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, EWW or VTI?
Each has led over a different period.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. EWW led over 1Y and 5Y, VTI over 3Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EWW | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1.8B | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.21% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 45 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +9.61% | +11.65%Best |
| 1Y Return | +21.07%Best | +17.34% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.59% | +20.35%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.20%Best | +11.72% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.9% | 15.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -67.3% | -56.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $17,781Best | $17,404 |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 12, 1996 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 31, 2001 to Sep 10, 2026 (25.3 years).
EWW vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 25.3 years both funds cover.
EWW vs VTI Performance
iShares MSCI Mexico ETF (EWW) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EWW returned +21.07% while VTI returned +17.34%. Year to date, EWW is up 9.61% versus a gain of 11.65% for VTI.
Over three years, EWW compounded at +11.59% per year against +20.35% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +12.20% and +11.72% respectively. Across the full 25-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.01% annualized vs +6.96%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EWW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.9% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -67.3% for EWW and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EWW charges 0.50% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EWW currently yields 3.21% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 41 holdings in EWW and 2,787 in VTI, totalling 99.5% and 90.6% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 62 days apart, EWW as of Aug 31, 2026 and VTI as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in EWW and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 45 and 3,543.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EWW and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EWW or VTI?
EWW has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $47 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EWW or VTI?
Over the past year EWW returned +21.07% vs +17.34% for VTI, so EWW leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (25 years), EWW annualized +6.96% vs +8.01% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EWW or VTI?
EWW has been the more volatile fund at 23.9% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: EWW -67.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both EWW and VTI?
EWW and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, EWW or VTI?
EWW yields 3.21% while VTI yields 1.03%, so EWW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than EWW?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. EWW led over 1Y and 5Y, VTI over 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.