EWW vs VOO
iShares MSCI Mexico ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. EWW delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EWW | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.8B | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.20% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 44 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +9.45% | +13.20% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.87% | +21.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.63% | +22.16% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.71% | +13.42% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 26.4% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -67.3% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 12, 1996 | Sep 7, 2010 |
EWW vs VOO Performance
iShares MSCI Mexico ETF (EWW) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EWW returned +26.87% while VOO returned +21.62%. Year to date, EWW is up 9.45% versus a gain of 13.20% for VOO.
Over three years, EWW compounded at +10.63% per year against +22.16% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +12.71% and +13.42% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.51% annualized vs +7.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EWW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.4% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -67.3% for EWW and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.60. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EWW charges 0.50% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EWW currently yields 3.20% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
EWW and VOO share 0 holdings out of 546 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EWW or VOO?
EWW has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EWW or VOO?
Over the past year EWW returned +26.87% vs +21.62% for VOO, so EWW leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), EWW annualized +7.16% vs +13.51% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EWW or VOO?
EWW has been the more volatile fund at 26.4% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: EWW -67.3% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both EWW and VOO?
EWW and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.60, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EWW and VOO?
EWW and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 546 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EWW or VOO?
EWW yields 3.20% while VOO yields 1.08%, so EWW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.