EWW vs VOO

EWW vs VOO

Which is better, EWW or VOO?

Each has led over a different period.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. EWW led over 1Y, VOO over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.9%.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns: splitLess Concentrated: VOO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricEWWVOO
Expense Ratio0.50%0.03%Best
AUM$1.8B$997.4B
Dividend Yield3.20%1.08%
Holdings45509
YTD Return+11.68%+12.74%Best
1Y Return+23.60%Best+19.43%
3Y Return (annualized)+12.31%+21.18%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+12.68%+12.76%Best
Volatility (annualized)21.9%14.1%Best
Max Drawdown-67.3%-34.3%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$18,165$18,230Best
Top 10 Weight63.9%36.4%Best
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionMar 12, 1996Sep 7, 2010

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 9, 2010 to Sep 8, 2026 (16 years).

EWW vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16 years both funds cover.

EWW vs VOO Performance

iShares MSCI Mexico ETF (EWW) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EWW returned +23.60% while VOO returned +19.43%. Year to date, EWW is up 11.68% versus a gain of 12.74% for VOO.

Over three years, EWW compounded at +12.31% per year against +21.18% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +12.68% and +12.76% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.43% annualized vs +3.84%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

EWW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.9% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -67.3% for EWW and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.60. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

EWW charges 0.50% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EWW currently yields 3.20% against 1.08% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 41 holdings in EWW and 504 in VOO, totalling 99.6% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

0 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in EWW and 504 in VOO, against full books of 45 and 509.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 494 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for EWW (99.3% of the fund), and 2 for EWW that do not appear in VOO (0.1%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of EWW and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

EWWVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, EWW or VOO?

EWW has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $47 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, EWW or VOO?

Over the past year EWW returned +23.60% vs +19.43% for VOO, so EWW leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), EWW annualized +3.84% vs +13.43% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, EWW or VOO?

EWW has been the more volatile fund at 21.9% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: EWW -67.3% vs VOO -34.3%.

Should I hold both EWW and VOO?

EWW and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.60, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, EWW or VOO?

EWW yields 3.20% while VOO yields 1.08%, so EWW currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than EWW?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. EWW led over 1Y, VOO over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.