EWZ vs VTI

EWZ vs VTI

Which is better, EWZ or VTI?

Each has led over a different period.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. EWZ led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y, 5Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricEWZVTI
Expense Ratio0.59%0.03%Best
AUM$8.3B$666.9B
Dividend Yield4.01%1.03%
Holdings563,543
YTD Return+20.89%Best+11.65%
1Y Return+35.25%Best+17.34%
3Y Return (annualized)+13.61%+20.35%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+10.48%+11.72%Best
Volatility (annualized)34.2%15.3%Best
Max Drawdown-82.8%-56.6%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$16,460$17,404Best
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJul 10, 2000May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 31, 2001 to Sep 10, 2026 (25.3 years).

EWZ vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 25.3 years both funds cover.

EWZ vs VTI Performance

iShares MSCI Brazil ETF (EWZ) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EWZ returned +35.25% while VTI returned +17.34%. Year to date, EWZ is up 20.89% versus a gain of 11.65% for VTI.

Over three years, EWZ compounded at +13.61% per year against +20.35% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +10.48% and +11.72% respectively. Across the full 25-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.01% annualized vs +5.56%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

EWZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 34.2% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -82.8% for EWZ and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.57. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

EWZ charges 0.59% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EWZ currently yields 4.01% against 1.03% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 46 holdings in EWZ and 2,787 in VTI, totalling 97.3% and 90.6% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

The two holdings books were reported 62 days apart, EWZ as of Aug 31, 2026 and VTI as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.

0 positions in common, counted across the 46 positions we hold weights for in EWZ and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 56 and 3,543.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of EWZ and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

EWZVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, EWZ or VTI?

EWZ has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $56 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, EWZ or VTI?

Over the past year EWZ returned +35.25% vs +17.34% for VTI, so EWZ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (25 years), EWZ annualized +5.56% vs +8.01% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, EWZ or VTI?

EWZ has been the more volatile fund at 34.2% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: EWZ -82.8% vs VTI -56.6%.

Should I hold both EWZ and VTI?

EWZ and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.57, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, EWZ or VTI?

EWZ yields 4.01% while VTI yields 1.03%, so EWZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than EWZ?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. EWZ led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.