EZJ vs VTI
ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. EZJ delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EZJ | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.17% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $14M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.93% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 8 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +37.10% | +14.82% | |
| 1Y Return | +51.94% | +22.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +31.50% | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.78% | +12.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 28.7% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -59.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 2, 2009 | May 24, 2001 |
EZJ vs VTI Performance
ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan (EZJ) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EZJ returned +51.94% while VTI returned +22.43%. Year to date, EZJ is up 37.10% versus a gain of 14.82% for VTI.
Over three years, EZJ compounded at +31.50% per year against +21.93% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +9.78% and +12.34% respectively. Across the full 17-year window we track, EZJ has the edge at +8.30% annualized vs +8.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EZJ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 28.7% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -59.7% for EZJ and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EZJ charges 1.17% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $117 vs $3 annually, a gap of $114 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EZJ currently yields 1.93% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
EZJ and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2789 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EZJ or VTI?
EZJ has an expense ratio of 1.17% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $114 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EZJ or VTI?
Over the past year EZJ returned +51.94% vs +22.43% for VTI, so EZJ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (17 years), EZJ annualized +8.30% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EZJ or VTI?
EZJ has been the more volatile fund at 28.7% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: EZJ -59.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both EZJ and VTI?
EZJ and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EZJ and VTI?
EZJ and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2789 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EZJ or VTI?
EZJ yields 1.93% while VTI yields 1.07%, so EZJ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.