EZJ vs VOO
ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. EZJ delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EZJ | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.17% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $14M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.93% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 8 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +37.10% | +14.27% | |
| 1Y Return | +51.94% | +21.79% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +31.50% | +22.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.78% | +13.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 28.7% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -59.7% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 2, 2009 | Sep 7, 2010 |
EZJ vs VOO Performance
ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan (EZJ) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EZJ returned +51.94% while VOO returned +21.79%. Year to date, EZJ is up 37.10% versus a gain of 14.27% for VOO.
Over three years, EZJ compounded at +31.50% per year against +22.19% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +9.78% and +13.28% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.59% annualized vs +8.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EZJ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 28.7% compared with 14.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -59.7% for EZJ and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EZJ charges 1.17% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $117 vs $3 annually, a gap of $114 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EZJ currently yields 1.93% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
EZJ and VOO share 0 holdings out of 507 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EZJ or VOO?
EZJ has an expense ratio of 1.17% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $114 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EZJ or VOO?
Over the past year EZJ returned +51.94% vs +21.79% for VOO, so EZJ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), EZJ annualized +8.30% vs +13.59% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EZJ or VOO?
EZJ has been the more volatile fund at 28.7% annualized versus 14.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: EZJ -59.7% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both EZJ and VOO?
EZJ and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EZJ and VOO?
EZJ and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 507 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EZJ or VOO?
EZJ yields 1.93% while VOO yields 1.08%, so EZJ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.