EZRO vs VTI
AlphaDroid Defensive Sector Rotation ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, EZRO or VTI?
Tactical Allocation against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EZRO | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.01% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $29M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 8 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +3.17% | +13.60%Best |
| 1Y Return | +2.49% | +18.17%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +23.04% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.14% |
| Top 10 Weight | - | 33.3% |
| Fund Family | Teucrium | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity |
| Style | Tactical Allocation | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 16, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
EZRO vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
EZRO vs VTI Performance
AlphaDroid Defensive Sector Rotation ETF (EZRO) is an ETF from Teucrium and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EZRO returned +2.49% while VTI returned +18.17%. Year to date, EZRO is up 3.17% versus a gain of 13.60% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EZRO charges 1.01% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $101 vs $3 annually, a gap of $98 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EZRO currently yields 0.00% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 6 holdings in EZRO and 3,463 in VTI, totalling 99.8% and 98.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 6 positions we hold weights for in EZRO and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 8 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,150 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for EZRO (97.5% of the fund), and 6 for EZRO that do not appear in VTI (99.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EZRO and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EZRO or VTI?
EZRO has an expense ratio of 1.01% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $98 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EZRO or VTI?
Over the past year EZRO returned +2.49% vs +18.17% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, EZRO or VTI?
EZRO yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than EZRO?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.