FDEM vs QQQ
Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, FDEM or QQQ?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. FDEM is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FDEM | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.25% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $581M | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.94% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 239 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +15.78% | +16.87%Best |
| 1Y Return | +22.05% | +22.98%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.69% | +24.98%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.76% | +14.39%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.6%Best | 20.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.6%Best | -35.1% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,930 | $19,586Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 38.9%Best | 46.5% |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Feb 26, 2019 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 28, 2019 to Sep 11, 2026 (7.5 years).
FDEM vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 7.5 years both funds cover.
FDEM vs QQQ Performance
Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF (FDEM) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year FDEM returned +22.05% while QQQ returned +22.98%. Year to date, FDEM is up 15.78% versus a gain of 16.87% for QQQ.
Over three years, FDEM compounded at +20.69% per year against +24.98% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +9.76% and +14.39% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +21.22% annualized vs +8.42%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.3% compared with 15.6% for FDEM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.6% for FDEM and -35.1% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FDEM charges 0.25% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $18 annually, a gap of $7 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FDEM currently yields 2.94% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 199 holdings in FDEM and 102 in QQQ, totalling 99.4% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 199 positions we hold weights for in FDEM and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 239 and 107.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 95 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for FDEM (97.0% of the fund), and 6 for FDEM that do not appear in QQQ (2.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FDEM and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FDEM or QQQ?
FDEM has an expense ratio of 0.25% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $7 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FDEM or QQQ?
Over the past year FDEM returned +22.05% vs +22.98% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), FDEM annualized +8.42% vs +21.22% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FDEM or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 20.3% annualized versus 15.6% for FDEM. Worst drawdown: FDEM -33.6% vs QQQ -35.1%.
Should I hold both FDEM and QQQ?
FDEM and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, FDEM or QQQ?
FDEM yields 2.94% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so FDEM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than FDEM?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. FDEM is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.