FDIG vs QQQ
Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FDIG | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $248M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.53% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 66 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +3.92% | +19.52% | |
| 1Y Return | +9.91% | +26.68% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +30.51% | +26.64% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 60.9% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -58.3% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 19, 2022 | Mar 10, 1999 |
FDIG vs QQQ Performance
Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF (FDIG) is a ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year FDIG returned +9.91% while QQQ returned +26.68%. Year to date, FDIG is up 3.92% versus a gain of 19.52% for QQQ.
Over three years, FDIG compounded at +30.51% per year against +26.64% for QQQ. Across the full 4-year window we track, FDIG has the edge at +14.97% annualized vs +13.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FDIG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 60.9% compared with 30.6% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -58.3% for FDIG and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FDIG charges 0.39% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $18 annually, a gap of $21 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FDIG currently yields 1.53% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
FDIG and QQQ share 2 holdings out of 156 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FDIG or QQQ?
FDIG has an expense ratio of 0.39% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $21 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FDIG or QQQ?
Over the past year FDIG returned +9.91% vs +26.68% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), FDIG annualized +14.97% vs +13.14% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FDIG or QQQ?
FDIG has been the more volatile fund at 60.9% annualized versus 30.6% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: FDIG -58.3% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both FDIG and QQQ?
FDIG and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FDIG and QQQ?
FDIG and QQQ share 2 common holdings with a 1.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 156 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FDIG or QQQ?
FDIG yields 1.53% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so FDIG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.