FEBU vs VTI

FEBU vs VTI

Which is better, FEBU or VTI?

Option Writing against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.99.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFEBUVTI
Expense Ratio0.74%0.03%Best
AUM$52M$666.9B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.03%
Holdings43,543
YTD Return+8.27%+12.30%Best
1Y Return+10.73%+16.08%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.01%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.36%
Volatility (annualized)8.9%Best13.1%
Max Drawdown-11.7%Best-19.3%
$10,000 over 1.6 years$11,926$12,856Best
Fund FamilyAllianzIMVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleOption WritingLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJan 31, 2025May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 3, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026 (1.6 years).

FEBU vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.6 years both funds cover.

FEBU vs VTI Performance

AllianzIM US Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Feb ETF (FEBU) is an ETF from AllianzIM and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FEBU returned +10.73% while VTI returned +16.08%. Year to date, FEBU is up 8.27% versus a gain of 12.30% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.1% compared with 8.9% for FEBU. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -11.7% for FEBU and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.99. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FEBU charges 0.74% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $74 vs $3 annually, a gap of $71 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FEBU currently yields 0.00% against 1.03% for VTI.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of FEBU and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

FEBUVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FEBU or VTI?

FEBU has an expense ratio of 0.74% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $71 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, FEBU or VTI?

Over the past year FEBU returned +10.73% vs +16.08% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FEBU annualized +11.64% vs +17.00% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, FEBU or VTI?

VTI has been the more volatile fund at 13.1% annualized versus 8.9% for FEBU. Worst drawdown: FEBU -11.7% vs VTI -19.3%.

Should I hold both FEBU and VTI?

FEBU and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.99, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, FEBU or VTI?

FEBU yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than FEBU?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.99. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.