FEBW vs QQQ
AllianzIM US Equity Buffer20 Feb ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FEBW | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.74% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $197M | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +6.20% | +18.31% | |
| 1Y Return | +10.79% | +25.37% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.83% | +25.79% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.20% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.3% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -8.8% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | AllianzIM | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 31, 2023 | Mar 10, 1999 |
FEBW vs QQQ Performance
AllianzIM US Equity Buffer20 Feb ETF (FEBW) is a ETF from AllianzIM and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year FEBW returned +10.79% while QQQ returned +25.37%. Year to date, FEBW is up 6.20% versus a gain of 18.31% for QQQ.
Over three years, FEBW compounded at +10.83% per year against +25.79% for QQQ. Across the full 4-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.10% annualized vs +10.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 5.3% for FEBW. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.8% for FEBW and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FEBW charges 0.74% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $74 vs $18 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FEBW currently yields 0.00% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FEBW or QQQ?
FEBW has an expense ratio of 0.74% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $56 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FEBW or QQQ?
Over the past year FEBW returned +10.79% vs +25.37% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), FEBW annualized +10.80% vs +13.10% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FEBW or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 5.3% for FEBW. Worst drawdown: FEBW -8.8% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both FEBW and QQQ?
FEBW and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, FEBW or QQQ?
FEBW yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.