FEBZ vs QQQ

FEBZ vs QQQ

Which is better, FEBZ or QQQ?

All Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91.

Lower Fees: QQQHigher Returns: QQQ

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFEBZQQQ
Expense Ratio0.79%0.18%Best
AUM$32M$483.5B
Dividend Yield2.22%0.44%
Holdings15107
YTD Return+8.32%+17.95%Best
1Y Return+7.43%+21.77%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+13.63%+25.63%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+10.02%+15.24%Best
Volatility (annualized)11.3%Best20.2%
Max Drawdown-17.5%Best-35.1%
$10,000 over 5 years$16,120$20,324Best
Fund FamilyTrueSharesInvesco (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleAll Cap BlendLarge Cap Growth
InceptionJan 29, 2021Mar 10, 1999

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 1, 2021 to Sep 18, 2026 (5.6 years).

FEBZ vs QQQ growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.6 years both funds cover.

FEBZ vs QQQ Performance

TrueShares Structured Outcome (February) ETF (FEBZ) is an ETF from TrueShares and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year FEBZ returned +7.43% while QQQ returned +21.77%. Year to date, FEBZ is up 8.32% versus a gain of 17.95% for QQQ.

Over three years, FEBZ compounded at +13.63% per year against +25.63% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +10.02% and +15.24% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +16.06% annualized vs +11.08%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.2% compared with 11.3% for FEBZ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.5% for FEBZ and -35.1% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FEBZ charges 0.79% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $18 annually, a gap of $61 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FEBZ currently yields 2.22% against 0.44% for QQQ.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 1 holding in FEBZ and 102 in QQQ, totalling 0.1% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in FEBZ and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 15 and 107.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of FEBZ and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

FEBZQQQ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FEBZ or QQQ?

FEBZ has an expense ratio of 0.79% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $61 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, FEBZ or QQQ?

Over the past year FEBZ returned +7.43% vs +21.77% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), FEBZ annualized +11.08% vs +16.06% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, FEBZ or QQQ?

QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 20.2% annualized versus 11.3% for FEBZ. Worst drawdown: FEBZ -17.5% vs QQQ -35.1%.

Should I hold both FEBZ and QQQ?

FEBZ and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, FEBZ or QQQ?

FEBZ yields 2.22% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so FEBZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is QQQ better than FEBZ?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.