FEBZ vs QQQ
TrueShares Structured Outcome (February) ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FEBZ | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $30M | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.26% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +10.30% | +19.68% | |
| 1Y Return | +11.81% | +26.75% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.05% | +26.25% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.02% | +15.39% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.4% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -17.5% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | TrueShares | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 29, 2021 | Mar 10, 1999 |
FEBZ vs QQQ Performance
TrueShares Structured Outcome (February) ETF (FEBZ) is a ETF from TrueShares and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year FEBZ returned +11.81% while QQQ returned +26.75%. Year to date, FEBZ is up 10.30% versus a gain of 19.68% for QQQ.
Over three years, FEBZ compounded at +14.05% per year against +26.25% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +10.02% and +15.39% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.15% annualized vs +11.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 11.4% for FEBZ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.5% for FEBZ and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FEBZ charges 0.79% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $18 annually, a gap of $61 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FEBZ currently yields 2.26% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
FEBZ and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 104 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FEBZ or QQQ?
FEBZ has an expense ratio of 0.79% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $61 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FEBZ or QQQ?
Over the past year FEBZ returned +11.81% vs +26.75% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), FEBZ annualized +11.65% vs +13.15% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FEBZ or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 11.4% for FEBZ. Worst drawdown: FEBZ -17.5% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both FEBZ and QQQ?
FEBZ and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between FEBZ and QQQ?
FEBZ and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 104 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FEBZ or QQQ?
FEBZ yields 2.26% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so FEBZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.