FEBZ vs VXUS
FEBZ vs VXUS
TrueShares Structured Outcome (February) ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FEBZ | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $30M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.26% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +9.80% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +13.12% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.79% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.08% | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.4% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -17.5% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | TrueShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 29, 2021 | Jan 26, 2011 |
FEBZ vs VXUS Performance
TrueShares Structured Outcome (February) ETF (FEBZ) is a ETF from TrueShares and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FEBZ returned +13.12% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, FEBZ is up 9.80% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, FEBZ compounded at +13.79% per year against +19.27% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +10.08% and +9.28% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, FEBZ has the edge at +11.60% annualized vs +4.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 11.4% for FEBZ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.5% for FEBZ and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FEBZ charges 0.79% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $5 annually, a gap of $74 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FEBZ currently yields 2.26% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
FEBZ and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7862 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FEBZ or VXUS?
FEBZ has an expense ratio of 0.79% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $74 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FEBZ or VXUS?
Over the past year FEBZ returned +13.12% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), FEBZ annualized +11.60% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FEBZ or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 11.4% for FEBZ. Worst drawdown: FEBZ -17.5% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both FEBZ and VXUS?
FEBZ and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FEBZ and VXUS?
FEBZ and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7862 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FEBZ or VXUS?
FEBZ yields 2.26% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.