FEUZ vs IVV
First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, FEUZ or IVV?
Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. FEUZ led over 1Y and 3Y, IVV over 5Y and the full window. FEUZ is less concentrated, with 13.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FEUZ | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.80% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $124M | $886.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.65% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 304 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +12.18% | +13.39%Best |
| 1Y Return | +23.97%Best | +20.08% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.24%Best | +21.29% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.23% | +12.88%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.1% | 14.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -50.1% | -33.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,274 | $18,327Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 13.1%Best | 37.9% |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 21, 2014 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 27, 2014 to Sep 4, 2026 (11.9 years).
FEUZ vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 11.9 years both funds cover.
FEUZ vs IVV Performance
First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX ETF (FEUZ) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FEUZ returned +23.97% while IVV returned +20.08%. Year to date, FEUZ is up 12.18% versus a gain of 13.39% for IVV.
Over three years, FEUZ compounded at +24.24% per year against +21.29% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +10.23% and +12.88% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +12.94% annualized vs +8.39%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FEUZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.1% compared with 14.9% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -50.1% for FEUZ and -33.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FEUZ charges 0.80% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $80 vs $3 annually, a gap of $77 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FEUZ currently yields 2.65% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
0.5% of FEUZ's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 0.5% of IVV's money is in holdings FEUZ also owns.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
1 positions in common, counted across the 150 positions we hold weights for in FEUZ and 504 in IVV, against full books of 304 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 492 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for FEUZ (98.7% of the fund), and 3 for FEUZ that do not appear in IVV (1.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FEUZ | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MRKMerck & Co. Inc. | 0.54% | 0.48% | 0.06% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FEUZ and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FEUZ or IVV?
FEUZ has an expense ratio of 0.80% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $77 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FEUZ or IVV?
Over the past year FEUZ returned +23.97% vs +20.08% for IVV, so FEUZ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), FEUZ annualized +8.39% vs +12.94% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FEUZ or IVV?
FEUZ has been the more volatile fund at 19.1% annualized versus 14.9% for IVV. Worst drawdown: FEUZ -50.1% vs IVV -33.9%.
Should I hold both FEUZ and IVV?
FEUZ and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, FEUZ or IVV?
FEUZ yields 2.65% while IVV yields 1.10%, so FEUZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than FEUZ?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. FEUZ led over 1Y and 3Y, IVV over 5Y and the full window. FEUZ is less concentrated, with 13.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.