FFIU vs SCHD
FFIU vs SCHD
Fieldstone UVA Unconstrained Medium-Term Fixed Income ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. FFIU offers more diversification with 119 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FFIU | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.54% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $53M | $103.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.07% | 3.31% | |
| Holdings | 131 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | -0.14% | +24.26% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.05% | +31.38% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.64% | +15.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.75% | +9.72% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 6.3% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -20.4% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | Spinnaker ETF Series | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 18, 2017 | Oct 20, 2011 |
FFIU vs SCHD Performance
Fieldstone UVA Unconstrained Medium-Term Fixed Income ETF (FFIU) is a ETF from Spinnaker ETF Series and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year FFIU returned +2.05% while SCHD returned +31.38%. Year to date, FFIU is down 0.14% versus a gain of 24.26% for SCHD.
Over three years, FFIU compounded at +3.64% per year against +15.08% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are -0.75% and +9.72% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.39% annualized vs +0.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SCHD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.6% compared with 6.3% for FFIU. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.4% for FFIU and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.48. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FFIU charges 0.54% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $54 vs $6 annually, a gap of $48 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FFIU currently yields 4.07% against 3.31% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
FFIU and SCHD share 0 holdings out of 219 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FFIU or SCHD?
FFIU has an expense ratio of 0.54% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $48 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FFIU or SCHD?
Over the past year FFIU returned +2.05% vs +31.38% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), FFIU annualized +0.35% vs +11.39% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FFIU or SCHD?
SCHD has been the more volatile fund at 13.6% annualized versus 6.3% for FFIU. Worst drawdown: FFIU -20.4% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both FFIU and SCHD?
FFIU and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.48, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FFIU and SCHD?
FFIU and SCHD share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 219 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FFIU or SCHD?
FFIU yields 4.07% while SCHD yields 3.31%, so FFIU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.