FFLV vs GTOS
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF vs Invesco Short Duration Total Return Bond ETF
Quick Verdict
GTOS has a lower expense ratio. FFLV delivered stronger 1-year returns. GTOS offers more diversification with 294 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FFLV | GTOS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.38% | 0.30% | |
| AUM | $16M | $122M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.41% | 4.55% | |
| Holdings | 119 | 1,047 | |
| YTD Return | +18.30% | -0.70% | |
| 1Y Return | +29.02% | +1.16% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +4.68% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.3% | 1.9% | |
| Max Drawdown | -16.7% | -1.8% | |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | Feb 9, 2024 | Dec 9, 2022 |
FFLV vs GTOS Performance
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF (FFLV) is a ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Invesco Short Duration Total Return Bond ETF (GTOS) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year FFLV returned +29.02% while GTOS returned +1.16%. Year to date, FFLV is up 18.30% versus a loss of 0.70% for GTOS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FFLV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.3% compared with 1.9% for GTOS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.7% for FFLV and -1.8% for GTOS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.35. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FFLV charges 0.38% per year while GTOS charges 0.30%. On a $10,000 position that is $38 vs $30 annually, a gap of $8 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FFLV currently yields 1.41% against 4.55% for GTOS.
Holdings Overlap
FFLV and GTOS share 0 holdings out of 399 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FFLV or GTOS?
FFLV has an expense ratio of 0.38% while GTOS charges 0.30%. GTOS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $8 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FFLV or GTOS?
Over the past year FFLV returned +29.02% vs +1.16% for GTOS, so FFLV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), FFLV annualized +17.62% vs +4.34% for GTOS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FFLV or GTOS?
FFLV has been the more volatile fund at 12.3% annualized versus 1.9% for GTOS. Worst drawdown: FFLV -16.7% vs GTOS -1.8%.
Should I hold both FFLV and GTOS?
FFLV and GTOS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.35, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FFLV and GTOS?
FFLV and GTOS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 399 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FFLV or GTOS?
FFLV yields 1.41% while GTOS yields 4.55%, so GTOS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.