FFLV vs SAWS
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF vs AAM Sawgrass US Small Cap Quality Growth ETF
Quick Verdict
FFLV has a lower expense ratio. FFLV delivered stronger 1-year returns. FFLV offers more diversification with 105 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FFLV | SAWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.38% | 0.55% | |
| AUM | $16M | $8M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.41% | 0.02% | |
| Holdings | 119 | 72 | |
| YTD Return | +18.21% | +15.39% | |
| 1Y Return | +32.01% | +22.34% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.3% | 18.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -16.7% | -22.0% | |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Advisors Asset Management, Inc. | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 9, 2024 | Jul 30, 2024 |
FFLV vs SAWS Performance
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF (FFLV) is a ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and AAM Sawgrass US Small Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWS) is a ETF from Advisors Asset Management, Inc.. Over the past year FFLV returned +32.01% while SAWS returned +22.34%. Year to date, FFLV is up 18.21% versus a gain of 15.39% for SAWS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SAWS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.4% compared with 12.3% for FFLV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.7% for FFLV and -22.0% for SAWS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FFLV charges 0.38% per year while SAWS charges 0.55%. On a $10,000 position that is $38 vs $55 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FFLV currently yields 1.41% against 0.02% for SAWS.
Holdings Overlap
FFLV and SAWS share 0 holdings out of 176 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FFLV or SAWS?
FFLV has an expense ratio of 0.38% while SAWS charges 0.55%. FFLV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $17 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FFLV or SAWS?
Over the past year FFLV returned +32.01% vs +22.34% for SAWS, so FFLV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FFLV annualized +17.65% vs +13.13% for SAWS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FFLV or SAWS?
SAWS has been the more volatile fund at 18.4% annualized versus 12.3% for FFLV. Worst drawdown: FFLV -16.7% vs SAWS -22.0%.
Should I hold both FFLV and SAWS?
FFLV and SAWS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FFLV and SAWS?
FFLV and SAWS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 176 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FFLV or SAWS?
FFLV yields 1.41% while SAWS yields 0.02%, so FFLV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.