FFUT vs VYM
Fidelity Managed Futures ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FFUT | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.80% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $247M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.94% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 165 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +12.18% | +15.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.47% | +26.12% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.25% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.51% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.3% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -5.6% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 3, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
FFUT vs VYM Performance
Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT) is a ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FFUT returned +21.47% while VYM returned +26.12%. Year to date, FFUT is up 12.18% versus a gain of 15.80% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 7.3% for FFUT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -5.6% for FFUT and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.31. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FFUT charges 0.80% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $80 vs $4 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FFUT currently yields 1.94% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
FFUT and VYM share 0 holdings out of 563 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FFUT or VYM?
FFUT has an expense ratio of 0.80% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $76 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FFUT or VYM?
Over the past year FFUT returned +21.47% vs +26.12% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), FFUT annualized +18.60% vs +7.07% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FFUT or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 7.3% for FFUT. Worst drawdown: FFUT -5.6% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both FFUT and VYM?
FFUT and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.31, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FFUT and VYM?
FFUT and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 563 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FFUT or VYM?
FFUT yields 1.94% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.