FFUT vs IVV
Fidelity Managed Futures ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FFUT | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.80% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $247M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.94% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 165 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +14.11% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.46% | +23.01% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.77% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.39% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.0% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -5.6% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 3, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
FFUT vs IVV Performance
Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT) is a ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FFUT returned +22.46% while IVV returned +23.01%. Year to date, FFUT is up 14.11% versus a gain of 13.80% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 7.0% for FFUT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -5.6% for FFUT and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.14. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FFUT charges 0.80% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $80 vs $3 annually, a gap of $77 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FFUT currently yields 1.94% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
FFUT and IVV share 1 holdings out of 509 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FFUT | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA | 2.41% | 7.76% | 5.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FFUT or IVV?
FFUT has an expense ratio of 0.80% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $77 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FFUT or IVV?
Over the past year FFUT returned +22.46% vs +23.01% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), FFUT annualized +20.19% vs +7.04% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FFUT or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 7.0% for FFUT. Worst drawdown: FFUT -5.6% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both FFUT and IVV?
FFUT and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.14, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FFUT and IVV?
FFUT and IVV share 1 common holdings with a 2.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 509 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FFUT or IVV?
FFUT yields 1.94% while IVV yields 1.09%, so FFUT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.