FICS vs VOO
First Trust International Developed Capital Strength ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FICS | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.70% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $215M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.91% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 59 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +8.90% | +13.79% | |
| 1Y Return | +14.31% | +23.01% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.79% | +21.78% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.55% | +13.39% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.6% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -29.2% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 15, 2020 | Sep 7, 2010 |
FICS vs VOO Performance
First Trust International Developed Capital Strength ETF (FICS) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FICS returned +14.31% while VOO returned +23.01%. Year to date, FICS is up 8.90% versus a gain of 13.79% for VOO.
Over three years, FICS compounded at +12.79% per year against +21.78% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +5.55% and +13.39% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.57% annualized vs +8.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FICS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.2% for FICS and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FICS charges 0.70% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $70 vs $3 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FICS currently yields 1.91% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
FICS and VOO share 0 holdings out of 555 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FICS or VOO?
FICS has an expense ratio of 0.70% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $67 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FICS or VOO?
Over the past year FICS returned +14.31% vs +23.01% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), FICS annualized +8.25% vs +13.57% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FICS or VOO?
FICS has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: FICS -29.2% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both FICS and VOO?
FICS and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FICS and VOO?
FICS and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 555 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FICS or VOO?
FICS yields 1.91% while VOO yields 1.09%, so FICS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.