FID vs VOO
First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. FID delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FID | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $172M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.06% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 165 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +14.29% | +12.87% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.13% | +21.15% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.53% | +20.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.66% | +12.76% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.6% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -39.8% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 23, 2013 | Sep 7, 2010 |
FID vs VOO Performance
First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FID returned +23.13% while VOO returned +21.15%. Year to date, FID is up 14.29% versus a gain of 12.87% for VOO.
Over three years, FID compounded at +19.53% per year against +20.93% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +9.66% and +12.76% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.46% annualized vs +6.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FID has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.6% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -39.8% for FID and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FID charges 0.60% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FID currently yields 4.06% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
FID and VOO share 0 holdings out of 579 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FID or VOO?
FID has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FID or VOO?
Over the past year FID returned +23.13% vs +21.15% for VOO, so FID leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), FID annualized +6.60% vs +13.46% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FID or VOO?
FID has been the more volatile fund at 16.6% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: FID -39.8% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both FID and VOO?
FID and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FID and VOO?
FID and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 579 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FID or VOO?
FID yields 4.06% while VOO yields 1.08%, so FID currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.