FIGO vs IVV
T-REX 2x Long FIG Daily Target ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FIGO | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.50% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | - | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | - | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 1 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | - | +13.43% | |
| 1Y Return | - | +22.61% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | - | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | - | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | REX Shares | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 15, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
FIGO vs IVV Performance
T-REX 2x Long FIG Daily Target ETF (FIGO) is a ETF from REX Shares and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US).
Fees and Cost Over Time
FIGO charges 1.50% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $150 vs $3 annually, a gap of $147 per year that compounds over a long holding period.
Holdings Overlap
FIGO and IVV share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FIGO or IVV?
FIGO has an expense ratio of 1.50% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $147 per year of difference.
What is the holdings overlap between FIGO and IVV?
FIGO and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.