FIGO vs QQQ
T-REX 2x Long FIG Daily Target ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FIGO | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.50% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | - | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | - | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 1 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | - | +18.31% | |
| 1Y Return | - | +25.37% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +25.79% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.20% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | - | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | - | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | REX Shares | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 15, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
FIGO vs QQQ Performance
T-REX 2x Long FIG Daily Target ETF (FIGO) is a ETF from REX Shares and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US).
Fees and Cost Over Time
FIGO charges 1.50% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $150 vs $18 annually, a gap of $132 per year that compounds over a long holding period.
Holdings Overlap
FIGO and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 104 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FIGO or QQQ?
FIGO has an expense ratio of 1.50% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $132 per year of difference.
What is the holdings overlap between FIGO and QQQ?
FIGO and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 104 unique securities.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.