FISR vs IVV
State Street Fixed Income Sector Rotation ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FISR | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $618M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.28% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 12 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | -0.13% | +14.29% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.08% | +21.79% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.88% | +22.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -1.24% | +13.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 6.0% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -21.3% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | State Street Investment Management | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 2, 2019 | May 15, 2000 |
FISR vs IVV Performance
State Street Fixed Income Sector Rotation ETF (FISR) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FISR returned +2.08% while IVV returned +21.79%. Year to date, FISR is down 0.13% versus a gain of 14.29% for IVV.
Over three years, FISR compounded at +3.88% per year against +22.19% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are -1.24% and +13.28% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.06% annualized vs -0.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 6.0% for FISR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.3% for FISR and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.53. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FISR charges 0.50% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FISR currently yields 4.28% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
FISR and IVV share 0 holdings out of 514 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FISR or IVV?
FISR has an expense ratio of 0.50% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FISR or IVV?
Over the past year FISR returned +2.08% vs +21.79% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), FISR annualized -0.06% vs +7.06% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FISR or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 6.0% for FISR. Worst drawdown: FISR -21.3% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both FISR and IVV?
FISR and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.53, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FISR and IVV?
FISR and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 514 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FISR or IVV?
FISR yields 4.28% while IVV yields 1.10%, so FISR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.