FISR vs QQQ
State Street Fixed Income Sector Rotation ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FISR | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $618M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.28% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 12 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | -0.09% | +16.64% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.32% | +27.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.09% | +25.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -1.26% | +14.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 6.0% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -21.3% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | State Street Investment Management | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 2, 2019 | Mar 10, 1999 |
FISR vs QQQ Performance
State Street Fixed Income Sector Rotation ETF (FISR) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year FISR returned +2.32% while QQQ returned +27.27%. Year to date, FISR is down 0.09% versus a gain of 16.64% for QQQ.
Over three years, FISR compounded at +4.09% per year against +25.96% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are -1.26% and +14.54% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.03% annualized vs -0.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 6.0% for FISR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.3% for FISR and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.54. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FISR charges 0.50% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $18 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FISR currently yields 4.28% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
FISR and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 111 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FISR or QQQ?
FISR has an expense ratio of 0.50% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FISR or QQQ?
Over the past year FISR returned +2.32% vs +27.27% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), FISR annualized -0.06% vs +13.03% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FISR or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 6.0% for FISR. Worst drawdown: FISR -21.3% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both FISR and QQQ?
FISR and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.54, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FISR and QQQ?
FISR and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 111 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FISR or QQQ?
FISR yields 4.28% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so FISR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.