FJUN vs OCTM
FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF - June vs FT Vest US Equity Max Buffer ETF - October
Which is better, FJUN or OCTM?
FJUN has been ahead.
FJUN led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FJUN | OCTM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85%Tie | 0.85%Tie |
| AUM | $1.4B | $32M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 10 | 10 |
| YTD Return | +8.00%Best | +5.08% |
| 1Y Return | +10.58%Best | +6.38% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.41% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.78% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.0% | 2.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -13.3% | -3.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 2 years | $12,113Best | $11,302 |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | First Trust Portfolios (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Option Writing | Option Writing |
| Inception | Jun 19, 2020 | Oct 18, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 21, 2024 to Oct 15, 2026 (2 years).
FJUN vs OCTM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2 years both funds cover.
FJUN vs OCTM Performance
FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF - June (FJUN) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and FT Vest US Equity Max Buffer ETF - October (OCTM) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year FJUN returned +10.58% while OCTM returned +6.38%. Year to date, FJUN is up 8.00% versus a gain of 5.08% for OCTM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FJUN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 7.0% compared with 2.6% for OCTM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.3% for FJUN and -3.3% for OCTM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FJUN charges 0.85% per year while OCTM charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $85 annually. On income, FJUN currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for OCTM.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FJUN and OCTM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FJUN or OCTM?
FJUN has an expense ratio of 0.85% while OCTM charges 0.85%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which performed better, FJUN or OCTM?
Over the past year FJUN returned +10.58% vs +6.38% for OCTM, so FJUN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FJUN annualized +10.06% vs +6.31% for OCTM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FJUN or OCTM?
FJUN has been the more volatile fund at 7.0% annualized versus 2.6% for OCTM. Worst drawdown: FJUN -13.3% vs OCTM -3.3%.
Should I hold both FJUN and OCTM?
FJUN and OCTM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, FJUN or OCTM?
FJUN yields 0.00% while OCTM yields 0.00%, so OCTM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is OCTM better than FJUN?
FJUN led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.