FLAU vs IVV
Franklin FTSE Australia ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLAU | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.09% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $181M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.05% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 111 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +14.53% | +13.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +16.82% | +21.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.04% | +22.17% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.27% | +13.42% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.1% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -46.0% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 2, 2017 | May 15, 2000 |
FLAU vs IVV Performance
Franklin FTSE Australia ETF (FLAU) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FLAU returned +16.82% while IVV returned +21.62%. Year to date, FLAU is up 14.53% versus a gain of 13.22% for IVV.
Over three years, FLAU compounded at +16.04% per year against +22.17% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +8.27% and +13.42% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.02% annualized vs +6.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FLAU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.1% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -46.0% for FLAU and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLAU charges 0.09% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $3 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLAU currently yields 3.05% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
FLAU and IVV share 0 holdings out of 609 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLAU or IVV?
FLAU has an expense ratio of 0.09% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $6 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FLAU or IVV?
Over the past year FLAU returned +16.82% vs +21.62% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), FLAU annualized +6.84% vs +7.02% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FLAU or IVV?
FLAU has been the more volatile fund at 20.1% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: FLAU -46.0% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both FLAU and IVV?
FLAU and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FLAU and IVV?
FLAU and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 609 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLAU or IVV?
FLAU yields 3.05% while IVV yields 1.10%, so FLAU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.