FLCH vs IVV
Franklin FTSE China ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, FLCH or IVV?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLCH | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.19% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $333M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.33% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 1,051 | 508 |
| YTD Return | -13.72% | +12.24%Best |
| 1Y Return | -13.25% | +18.61%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.29% | +20.98%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -3.35% | +12.76%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.9% | 16.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -62.1% | -33.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $8,434 | $18,230Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 40.0% | 37.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 2, 2017 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 6, 2017 to Sep 9, 2026 (8.8 years).
FLCH vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8.8 years both funds cover.
FLCH vs IVV Performance
Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) is an ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FLCH returned -13.25% while IVV returned +18.61%. Year to date, FLCH is down 13.72% versus a gain of 12.24% for IVV.
Over three years, FLCH compounded at +9.29% per year against +20.98% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are -3.35% and +12.76% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +13.96% annualized vs -0.59%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FLCH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.9% compared with 16.3% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -62.1% for FLCH and -33.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.33. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLCH charges 0.19% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $19 vs $3 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLCH currently yields 2.33% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 861 holdings in FLCH and 505 in IVV, totalling 96.1% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 861 positions we hold weights for in FLCH and 505 in IVV, against full books of 1,051 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 495 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for FLCH (99.3% of the fund), and 11 for FLCH that do not appear in IVV (1.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FLCH and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLCH or IVV?
FLCH has an expense ratio of 0.19% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $16 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FLCH or IVV?
Over the past year FLCH returned -13.25% vs +18.61% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), FLCH annualized -0.59% vs +13.96% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FLCH or IVV?
FLCH has been the more volatile fund at 24.9% annualized versus 16.3% for IVV. Worst drawdown: FLCH -62.1% vs IVV -33.9%.
Should I hold both FLCH and IVV?
FLCH and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.33, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLCH or IVV?
FLCH yields 2.33% while IVV yields 1.06%, so FLCH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than FLCH?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.