FLXN vs VOO
Horizon Flexible Income ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLXN | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.82% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $50M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 7.95% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 4 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -1.81% | +13.72% | |
| 1Y Return | -0.85% | +21.63% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.55% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 3.8% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -5.9% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Horizon Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 2, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
FLXN vs VOO Performance
Horizon Flexible Income ETF (FLXN) is a ETF from Horizon Funds and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FLXN returned -0.85% while VOO returned +21.63%. Year to date, FLXN is down 1.81% versus a gain of 13.72% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 3.8% for FLXN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -5.9% for FLXN and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.30. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLXN charges 0.82% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $82 vs $3 annually, a gap of $79 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLXN currently yields 7.95% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
FLXN and VOO share 0 holdings out of 507 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLXN or VOO?
FLXN has an expense ratio of 0.82% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $79 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FLXN or VOO?
Over the past year FLXN returned -0.85% vs +21.63% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), FLXN annualized -0.05% vs +13.56% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FLXN or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 3.8% for FLXN. Worst drawdown: FLXN -5.9% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both FLXN and VOO?
FLXN and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.30, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FLXN and VOO?
FLXN and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 507 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLXN or VOO?
FLXN yields 7.95% while VOO yields 1.09%, so FLXN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.