FMAT vs VTI
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, FMAT or VTI?
Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FMAT | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.08% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $579M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.46% | 1.07% |
| Holdings | 104 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +12.41% | +13.59%Best |
| 1Y Return | +15.81% | +20.00%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.01% | +20.95%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.77% | +11.81%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.1% | 14.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -43.9% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $13,875 | $17,474Best |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 21, 2013 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 24, 2013 to Sep 4, 2026 (12.9 years).
FMAT vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 12.9 years both funds cover.
FMAT vs VTI Performance
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF (FMAT) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FMAT returned +15.81% while VTI returned +20.00%. Year to date, FMAT is up 12.41% versus a gain of 13.59% for VTI.
Over three years, FMAT compounded at +11.01% per year against +20.95% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +6.77% and +11.81% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +12.38% annualized vs +7.78%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FMAT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.1% compared with 14.9% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -43.9% for FMAT and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FMAT charges 0.08% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $8 vs $3 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FMAT currently yields 1.46% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 79.1% of FMAT's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VTI, our book for it covers 92.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
Most of FMAT is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
71 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in FMAT and 2,788 in VTI, against full books of 104 and 3,543.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FMAT | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| LINLinde Plc Ordinary Shares | 14.87% | 0.33% | 14.54% |
| NEMNewmont Corp. | 7.45% | 0.14% | 7.31% |
| SHWSherwin Williams Co | 5.59% | 0.11% | 5.48% |
| ECLEcolab, Inc. | 4.72% | 0.10% | 4.62% |
| APDAir Products & Chemicals In | 4.15% | 0.09% | 4.06% |
| NUENucor Corp. | 3.95% | 0.07% | 3.88% |
| CTVACorteva Inc. | 3.38% | 0.08% | 3.30% |
| VMCVulcan Materials Co. | 2.40% | 0.05% | 2.35% |
| STLDSteel Dynamics Inc | 2.36% | 0.04% | 2.32% |
| MLMMartin Marietta Materials Inc. | 2.12% | 0.05% | 2.07% |
79.1% of FMAT is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FMAT or VTI?
FMAT has an expense ratio of 0.08% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $5 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FMAT or VTI?
Over the past year FMAT returned +15.81% vs +20.00% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), FMAT annualized +7.78% vs +12.38% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FMAT or VTI?
FMAT has been the more volatile fund at 19.1% annualized versus 14.9% for VTI. Worst drawdown: FMAT -43.9% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both FMAT and VTI?
FMAT and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FMAT and VTI?
At least 79.1% of FMAT's money is in holdings VTI also owns. Our book for VTI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 71 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in FMAT and 2,788 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, FMAT or VTI?
FMAT yields 1.46% while VTI yields 1.07%, so FMAT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than FMAT?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.