FNX vs VTI
First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. FNX delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FNX | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.62% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.4B | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.81% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 451 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +14.64% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.21% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.89% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.18% | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.0% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -57.6% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 8, 2007 | May 24, 2001 |
FNX vs VTI Performance
First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FNX) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FNX returned +23.21% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, FNX is up 14.64% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, FNX compounded at +16.89% per year against +21.83% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +9.18% and +12.01% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, FNX has the edge at +8.92% annualized vs +8.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FNX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.0% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -57.6% for FNX and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FNX charges 0.62% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $62 vs $3 annually, a gap of $59 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FNX currently yields 0.81% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
FNX and VTI share 334 holdings out of 2902 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FNX or VTI?
FNX has an expense ratio of 0.62% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $59 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FNX or VTI?
Over the past year FNX returned +23.21% vs +22.35% for VTI, so FNX leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), FNX annualized +8.92% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FNX or VTI?
FNX has been the more volatile fund at 20.0% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: FNX -57.6% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both FNX and VTI?
FNX and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between FNX and VTI?
FNX and VTI share 334 common holdings with a 2.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2902 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FNX or VTI?
FNX yields 0.81% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.