FOCT vs XJUN
FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF - October vs FT Vest US Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - June
Which is better, FOCT or XJUN?
FOCT has been ahead.
FOCT led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FOCT | XJUN |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85%Tie | 0.85%Tie |
| AUM | $1.2B | $138M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 10 | 12 |
| YTD Return | +11.60%Best | +5.99% |
| 1Y Return | +14.86%Best | +8.09% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.66%Best | +10.75% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.65%Best | +8.71% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.0% | 5.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -14.1% | -9.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,851Best | $15,183 |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | First Trust Portfolios (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Option Writing | Option Writing |
| Inception | Oct 16, 2020 | Jul 12, 2021 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 13, 2021 to Oct 14, 2026 (5.3 years).
FOCT vs XJUN growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.3 years both funds cover.
FOCT vs XJUN Performance
FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF - October (FOCT) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and FT Vest US Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - June (XJUN) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year FOCT returned +14.86% while XJUN returned +8.09%. Year to date, FOCT is up 11.60% versus a gain of 5.99% for XJUN.
Over three years, FOCT compounded at +13.66% per year against +10.75% for XJUN; over five years the annualized figures are +9.65% and +8.71% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FOCT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 10.0% compared with 5.7% for XJUN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.1% for FOCT and -9.1% for XJUN. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FOCT charges 0.85% per year while XJUN charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $85 annually. On income, FOCT currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for XJUN.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FOCT and XJUN you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FOCT or XJUN?
FOCT has an expense ratio of 0.85% while XJUN charges 0.85%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which performed better, FOCT or XJUN?
Over the past year FOCT returned +14.86% vs +8.09% for XJUN, so FOCT leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FOCT or XJUN?
FOCT has been the more volatile fund at 10.0% annualized versus 5.7% for XJUN. Worst drawdown: FOCT -14.1% vs XJUN -9.1%.
Should I hold both FOCT and XJUN?
FOCT and XJUN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, FOCT or XJUN?
FOCT yields 0.00% while XJUN yields 0.00%, so XJUN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XJUN better than FOCT?
FOCT led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.