FPAS vs IVV

FPAS vs IVV

Which is better, FPAS or IVV?

Short Term High Quality against Large Cap Blend.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFPASIVV
Expense Ratio0.10%0.03%Best
AUM$13M$876.4B
Dividend Yield4.86%1.06%
Holdings3508
YTD Return-4.09%+12.27%Best
1Y Return-3.40%+17.04%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.24%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.08%
Volatility (annualized)3.2%Best12.7%
Max Drawdown-5.4%Best-18.8%
$10,000 over 1.9 years$10,248$13,704Best
Fund FamilyFPA Investors FirstiShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryFixed IncomeEquity
StyleShort Term High QualityLarge Cap Blend
InceptionOct 31, 2024May 15, 2000

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 1, 2024 to Sep 17, 2026 (1.9 years).

FPAS vs IVV growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.9 years both funds cover.

FPAS vs IVV Performance

FPA Short Duration Government ETF (FPAS) is an ETF from FPA Investors First and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FPAS returned -3.40% while IVV returned +17.04%. Year to date, FPAS is down 4.09% versus a gain of 12.27% for IVV.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.7% compared with 3.2% for FPAS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -5.4% for FPAS and -18.8% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.07. They move largely independently of each other.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FPAS charges 0.10% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $10 vs $3 annually, a gap of $7 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FPAS currently yields 4.86% against 1.06% for IVV.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of FPAS and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

FPASIVV

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FPAS or IVV?

FPAS has an expense ratio of 0.10% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $7 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, FPAS or IVV?

Over the past year FPAS returned -3.40% vs +17.04% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FPAS annualized +1.30% vs +18.04% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, FPAS or IVV?

IVV has been the more volatile fund at 12.7% annualized versus 3.2% for FPAS. Worst drawdown: FPAS -5.4% vs IVV -18.8%.

Should I hold both FPAS and IVV?

FPAS and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of -0.07, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, FPAS or IVV?

FPAS yields 4.86% while IVV yields 1.06%, so FPAS currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is IVV better than FPAS?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.