FSIG vs VOO
First Trust Limited Duration Investment Grade Corporate ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FSIG | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.44% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.5B | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.80% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 322 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +0.75% | +13.44% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.62% | +22.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.16% | +21.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.27% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 3.2% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -6.9% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 17, 2021 | Sep 7, 2010 |
FSIG vs VOO Performance
First Trust Limited Duration Investment Grade Corporate ETF (FSIG) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FSIG returned +2.62% while VOO returned +22.62%. Year to date, FSIG is up 0.75% versus a gain of 13.44% for VOO.
Over three years, FSIG compounded at +5.16% per year against +21.47% for VOO. Across the full 5-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.55% annualized vs +2.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 3.2% for FSIG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -6.9% for FSIG and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.65. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FSIG charges 0.44% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $44 vs $3 annually, a gap of $41 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FSIG currently yields 4.80% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
FSIG and VOO share 0 holdings out of 732 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FSIG or VOO?
FSIG has an expense ratio of 0.44% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $41 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FSIG or VOO?
Over the past year FSIG returned +2.62% vs +22.62% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), FSIG annualized +2.68% vs +13.55% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FSIG or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 3.2% for FSIG. Worst drawdown: FSIG -6.9% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both FSIG and VOO?
FSIG and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.65, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FSIG and VOO?
FSIG and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 732 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FSIG or VOO?
FSIG yields 4.80% while VOO yields 1.09%, so FSIG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.