FSMB vs VTI

FSMB vs VTI

Which is better, FSMB or VTI?

Municipal Bond against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFSMBVTI
Expense Ratio0.34%0.03%Best
AUM$622M$666.9B
Dividend Yield3.18%1.03%
Holdings1,1043,543
YTD Return+0.61%+12.08%Best
1Y Return+0.77%+16.31%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+3.20%+20.83%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+1.26%+11.89%Best
Volatility (annualized)2.6%Best17.3%
Max Drawdown-6.3%Best-35.0%
$10,000 over 5 years$10,646$17,537Best
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryFixed IncomeEquity
StyleMunicipal BondLarge Cap Blend
InceptionNov 1, 2018May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 27, 2018 to Sep 14, 2026 (7.8 years).

FSMB vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

FSMB vs VTI Performance

First Trust Short Duration Managed Municipal ETF (FSMB) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FSMB returned +0.77% while VTI returned +16.31%. Year to date, FSMB is up 0.61% versus a gain of 12.08% for VTI.

Over three years, FSMB compounded at +3.20% per year against +20.83% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +1.26% and +11.89% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +14.85% annualized vs +1.43%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.3% compared with 2.6% for FSMB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -6.3% for FSMB and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.54. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FSMB charges 0.34% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $34 vs $3 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FSMB currently yields 3.18% against 1.03% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 322 holdings in FSMB and 3,463 in VTI, totalling 58.8% and 98.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

0 positions in common, counted across the 322 positions we hold weights for in FSMB and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 1,104 and 3,543.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of FSMB and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

FSMBVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FSMB or VTI?

FSMB has an expense ratio of 0.34% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $31 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, FSMB or VTI?

Over the past year FSMB returned +0.77% vs +16.31% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), FSMB annualized +1.43% vs +14.85% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, FSMB or VTI?

VTI has been the more volatile fund at 17.3% annualized versus 2.6% for FSMB. Worst drawdown: FSMB -6.3% vs VTI -35.0%.

Should I hold both FSMB and VTI?

FSMB and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.54, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, FSMB or VTI?

FSMB yields 3.18% while VTI yields 1.03%, so FSMB currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than FSMB?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.