FSMB vs VYM
First Trust Short Duration Managed Municipal ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FSMB | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.34% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $632M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.18% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 557 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +1.36% | +15.60% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.55% | +23.48% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.49% | +19.07% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +1.41% | +12.50% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 2.6% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -6.3% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 1, 2018 | Nov 10, 2006 |
FSMB vs VYM Performance
First Trust Short Duration Managed Municipal ETF (FSMB) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FSMB returned +2.55% while VYM returned +23.48%. Year to date, FSMB is up 1.36% versus a gain of 15.60% for VYM.
Over three years, FSMB compounded at +3.49% per year against +19.07% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +1.41% and +12.50% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.05% annualized vs +1.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 2.6% for FSMB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -6.3% for FSMB and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.45. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FSMB charges 0.34% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $34 vs $4 annually, a gap of $30 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FSMB currently yields 3.18% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
FSMB and VYM share 0 holdings out of 933 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FSMB or VYM?
FSMB has an expense ratio of 0.34% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $30 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FSMB or VYM?
Over the past year FSMB returned +2.55% vs +23.48% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), FSMB annualized +1.54% vs +7.05% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FSMB or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 2.6% for FSMB. Worst drawdown: FSMB -6.3% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both FSMB and VYM?
FSMB and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.45, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FSMB and VYM?
FSMB and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 933 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FSMB or VYM?
FSMB yields 3.18% while VYM yields 2.24%, so FSMB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.