FTBI vs IVV
First Trust Balanced Income ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, FTBI or IVV?
Allocation/Balanced against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 79.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FTBI | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.98% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $24M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 7.65% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 15 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +6.15% | +12.27%Best |
| 1Y Return | +8.30% | +17.04%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.24% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.08% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 6.2%Best | 12.0% |
| Max Drawdown | -5.3%Best | -8.9% |
| $10,000 over 1.3 years | $11,748 | $13,113Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 79.2% | 37.8%Best |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity |
| Style | Allocation/Balanced | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 28, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 29, 2025 to Sep 17, 2026 (1.3 years).
FTBI vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.3 years both funds cover.
FTBI vs IVV Performance
First Trust Balanced Income ETF (FTBI) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FTBI returned +8.30% while IVV returned +17.04%. Year to date, FTBI is up 6.15% versus a gain of 12.27% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.0% compared with 6.2% for FTBI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -5.3% for FTBI and -8.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FTBI charges 0.98% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $98 vs $3 annually, a gap of $95 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FTBI currently yields 7.65% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 15 holdings in FTBI and 490 in IVV, totalling 99.9% and 99.3% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 15 positions we hold weights for in FTBI and 490 in IVV, against full books of 15 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 15 and 490 positions we hold weights for.
IVV holds 482 positions FTBI does not, 98.6% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 8.07%, AAPL 7.02%, MSFT 5.69%, AMZN 3.84%, GOOGL 3.00%
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FTBI and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FTBI or IVV?
FTBI has an expense ratio of 0.98% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $95 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FTBI or IVV?
Over the past year FTBI returned +8.30% vs +17.04% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), FTBI annualized +13.19% vs +23.18% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FTBI or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 12.0% annualized versus 6.2% for FTBI. Worst drawdown: FTBI -5.3% vs IVV -8.9%.
Should I hold both FTBI and IVV?
FTBI and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, FTBI or IVV?
FTBI yields 7.65% while IVV yields 1.06%, so FTBI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than FTBI?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 79.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.