FTCA vs IVV
Franklin California Municipal Income ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, FTCA or IVV?
Municipal California against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FTCA | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $563M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.73% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 297 | 508 |
| YTD Return | -1.81% | +12.01%Best |
| 1Y Return | -1.49% | +16.48%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.21% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.95% |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | Municipal California | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 29, 1993 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
FTCA vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
FTCA vs IVV Performance
Franklin California Municipal Income ETF (FTCA) is an ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FTCA returned -1.49% while IVV returned +16.48%. Year to date, FTCA is down 1.81% versus a gain of 12.01% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FTCA charges 0.35% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FTCA currently yields 3.73% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 56 holdings in FTCA and 490 in IVV, totalling 28.9% and 99.3% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 56 positions we hold weights for in FTCA and 490 in IVV, against full books of 297 and 508.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FTCA and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FTCA or IVV?
FTCA has an expense ratio of 0.35% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FTCA or IVV?
Over the past year FTCA returned -1.49% vs +16.48% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, FTCA or IVV?
FTCA yields 3.73% while IVV yields 1.06%, so FTCA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than FTCA?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.