FTGS vs PATN
First Trust Growth Strength ETF vs Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF
Quick Verdict
FTGS has a lower expense ratio. PATN delivered stronger 1-year returns. PATN offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FTGS | PATN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.65% | |
| AUM | $1.4B | $234M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.08% | 1.67% | |
| Holdings | 51 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +12.03% | +30.11% | |
| 1Y Return | +14.00% | +51.30% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.62% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.6% | 21.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -20.0% | -16.8% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Pacer ETFs | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 25, 2022 | Sep 16, 2024 |
FTGS vs PATN Performance
First Trust Growth Strength ETF (FTGS) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs. Over the past year FTGS returned +14.00% while PATN returned +51.30%. Year to date, FTGS is up 12.03% versus a gain of 30.11% for PATN.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PATN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.1% compared with 14.6% for FTGS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.0% for FTGS and -16.8% for PATN. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.43. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FTGS charges 0.60% per year while PATN charges 0.65%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $65 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FTGS currently yields 0.08% against 1.67% for PATN.
Holdings Overlap
FTGS and PATN share 0 holdings out of 151 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FTGS or PATN?
FTGS has an expense ratio of 0.60% while PATN charges 0.65%. FTGS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $5 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FTGS or PATN?
Over the past year FTGS returned +14.00% vs +51.30% for PATN, so PATN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FTGS annualized +19.50% vs +37.49% for PATN. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FTGS or PATN?
PATN has been the more volatile fund at 21.1% annualized versus 14.6% for FTGS. Worst drawdown: FTGS -20.0% vs PATN -16.8%.
Should I hold both FTGS and PATN?
FTGS and PATN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.43, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FTGS and PATN?
FTGS and PATN share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 151 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FTGS or PATN?
FTGS yields 0.08% while PATN yields 1.67%, so PATN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.