FTKI vs SBIO
First Trust Small Cap BuyWrite Income ETF vs ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF
Quick Verdict
SBIO has a lower expense ratio. SBIO delivered stronger 1-year returns. FTKI offers more diversification with 144 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FTKI | SBIO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.50% | |
| AUM | $25M | $202M | |
| Dividend Yield | 12.53% | 4.05% | |
| Holdings | 170 | 87 | |
| YTD Return | +13.28% | +33.77% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.74% | +104.83% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +32.41% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.72% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.3% | 29.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -15.2% | -63.1% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | ALPS Advisors | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 26, 2025 | Dec 30, 2014 |
FTKI vs SBIO Performance
First Trust Small Cap BuyWrite Income ETF (FTKI) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF (SBIO) is a ETF from ALPS Advisors. Over the past year FTKI returned +21.74% while SBIO returned +104.83%. Year to date, FTKI is up 13.28% versus a gain of 33.77% for SBIO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SBIO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 29.6% compared with 10.3% for FTKI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.2% for FTKI and -63.1% for SBIO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.21. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FTKI charges 0.85% per year while SBIO charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $50 annually, a gap of $35 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FTKI currently yields 12.53% against 4.05% for SBIO.
Holdings Overlap
FTKI and SBIO share 1 holdings out of 248 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FTKI | Weight in SBIO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| RIGL | 0.20% | 0.37% | 0.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FTKI or SBIO?
FTKI has an expense ratio of 0.85% while SBIO charges 0.50%. SBIO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $35 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FTKI or SBIO?
Over the past year FTKI returned +21.74% vs +104.83% for SBIO, so SBIO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FTKI annualized +12.78% vs +9.71% for SBIO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FTKI or SBIO?
SBIO has been the more volatile fund at 29.6% annualized versus 10.3% for FTKI. Worst drawdown: FTKI -15.2% vs SBIO -63.1%.
Should I hold both FTKI and SBIO?
FTKI and SBIO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.21, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FTKI and SBIO?
FTKI and SBIO share 1 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 248 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FTKI or SBIO?
FTKI yields 12.53% while SBIO yields 4.05%, so FTKI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.