FVC vs IVV
First Trust Dorsey Wright Dynamic Focus 5 ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FVC | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.87% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $104M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.96% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +13.35% | +13.43% | |
| 1Y Return | +19.26% | +22.61% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.57% | +21.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.08% | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.8% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -31.0% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 8, 2016 | May 15, 2000 |
FVC vs IVV Performance
First Trust Dorsey Wright Dynamic Focus 5 ETF (FVC) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FVC returned +19.26% while IVV returned +22.61%. Year to date, FVC is up 13.35% versus a gain of 13.43% for IVV.
Over three years, FVC compounded at +9.57% per year against +21.47% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +4.08% and +13.26% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, FVC has the edge at +8.05% annualized vs +7.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 14.8% for FVC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -31.0% for FVC and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FVC charges 0.87% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $87 vs $3 annually, a gap of $84 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FVC currently yields 1.96% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
FVC and IVV share 0 holdings out of 510 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FVC or IVV?
FVC has an expense ratio of 0.87% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $84 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FVC or IVV?
Over the past year FVC returned +19.26% vs +22.61% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), FVC annualized +8.05% vs +7.03% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FVC or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 14.8% for FVC. Worst drawdown: FVC -31.0% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both FVC and IVV?
FVC and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FVC and IVV?
FVC and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 510 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FVC or IVV?
FVC yields 1.96% while IVV yields 1.09%, so FVC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.